K. Saito et Wm. Thurlbeck, MEASUREMENT OF EMPHYSEMA IN AUTOPSY LUNGS, WITH EMPHASIS ON INTERLOBAR DIFFERENCES, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 151(5), 1995, pp. 1373-1376
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
This study clarifies interlobar differences in the severity of emphyse
ma and examines the feasibility of assessing emphysema in a whole lung
using either the upper or lower lobes. Midsagittal, paper-mounted who
le-lung sections from 79 consecutive autopsies were used. The whole-lu
ng sections were scored by comparing them with the panel of standard p
ictures from Grades 0 to 100, after which the upper or lower lobes wer
e scored in the same way but with the other lobe covered. Scores made
on lobes and whole lungs correlated significantly, but while projectio
ns to whole-lung scores were quite accurate from the upper robe, the p
rojections from the lower robe were less precise. This was particularl
y true in patients with mild emphysema. Individual lobes of the same l
ung sections were assessed by the Ryder grid method. This analysis sho
wed that emphysema was more severe in the upper robe of the 79 consecu
tive cases. The panel grading method showed more severe emphysema in t
he upper lobe than in the lower lobe to a panel score of 40; after thi
s, the severity of emphysema in the two lobes was similar. Scores made
from the Ryder grid were very similar to those made from the panel. G
rading emphysema from one lobe, particularly the lower lobe, is not ap
propriate if precise clinicopathologic correlations are required.