I. Dundas et al., COMPARISON OF SINGLE-BREATH AND PLETHYSMOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS OF RESISTANCE IN INFANCY, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 151(5), 1995, pp. 1451-1458
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
Single-breath technique (SET) measurements of total respiratory resist
ance (Rrs) were compared with plethysmographic measurements of airway
resistance (Raw) in healthy infants less than or equal to 13 wk of age
(Group 1; n = 49) and > 13 wk of age (Group 2; n = 37) and in infants
> 13 wk of age with prior wheeze (Group 3; n = 49). A significantly h
igher percentage of Rrs (19%) than of Raw (2%) measurements were techn
ically unsatisfactory, alinearity of the flow-volume curve accounting
for 54% of Rrs failures. Although both Rrs and Raw were significantly
higher in Group 3 infants, between-subject variability was wide in all
groups. Rrs was significantly higher than initial expiratory (IE) Raw
in all groups. Mean difference Rrs - IE Raw (95% CI) values were 1.98
(1.51, 2.48), 1.29 (0.96, 1.62), and 1.97 (1.56, 2.38) kPa . L(-1). s
for Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Significant but smaller differe
nces were seen for end-expiratory (EE) Raw in Groups 1 and 2 but not i
n Group 3. Mean difference Rrs - EE Raw (95% CI) values were 0.68 (0.1
1, 1.26), 0.55 (0.19, 0.92), and 0.31 (-0.06, 0.69) kPa . L(-1). s for
Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Despite wide between-subject variab
ility in Rrs and a relatively high failure rate, the SET is simple to
use, and it may be applicable to epidemiologic studies. However, clini
cal applications in individual infants may be limited by failure to de
tect the dynamic changes in resistance throughout the breath evident f
rom plethysmographic studies.