Midface hypoplasia, often associated with exorbitism and malocclusion,
has been traditionally corrected by using Le Fort advancement osteoto
mies through wide surgical exposure, These procedures suffer the disad
vantages of hemorrhage, unpredictable bone graft resorption, the need
for retained hardware, and bone graft donor-site morbidity. We present
an investigation of midface distraction in the canine without osteoto
mies, Five canines were the subjects of this study and were divided in
to two groups, At the time of placement of the lengthening devices, Gr
oup 1 animals were 10 weeks of age and Group 2 animals were 5 years of
age, Under general anesthesia, four modified Hoffman bone distracters
were mounted on 2-mm half pins placed individually across the nasofro
ntal and the zygomaticotemporal sutures an each side of the craniofaci
al skeleton, Distraction of all devices was begun on postoperative day
1 at the rate of 0.5 mm/day for 4 days and then 1.0 mm/day for 28 day
s, after which interval the devices were removed, Phe dogs were serial
ly monitored and examined for 3 months, one dog in the first group ser
ved as a sham control, The results were assessed by standardized cepha
lograms, and craniofacial computed tomographic scans with three-dimens
ional reconstruction performed before device placement as well as afte
r removal of the device, In one Group 1 animal, computed tomographic s
canning was performed every 2 to 4 weeks far 3 months, Gross examinati
on of the Group 1 animals demonstrated the development of enophthalmos
, dolichocephaly, and a class II malocclusion-overbite. No evidence of
distraction or advancement of the midface was observed in the Group 2
dogs. Midface distraction is feasible in the immature animal. If mini
aturized devices could be developed, the clinical implications for you
ng patients with midface hypoplasia may be significant.