Two unsteady Euler solvers using high-order upwind finite volume metho
ds are presented and compared. The first uses the Van Leer nux vector
splitting on structured moving grids and includes compatibility relati
ons to treat boundary conditions. The second is based on Roe's approxi
mate Riemann solver on fixed unstructured, finite element type meshes
and uses a standard explicit boundary treatment. Results for one- and
two-dimensional strong wave propagation and interaction show very good
agreement between the two approaches and reference solutions, despite
the use of different flux evaluations and integration cells. The two
schemes even exhibit the same numerical sensitivity of wave propagatio
n to mesh orientation. However, the simulation of the shock wave refle
ction from a wall reveals some flaws in the second solver's slip wall
treatment which are avoided by the compatibility relations used in the
first method.