CLONIDINE POTENTIATES THE GROWTH-HORMONE RESPONSE TO A GROWTH-HORMONERELEASING HORMONE CHALLENGE IN HYPOTHALAMIC GROWTH-HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE-DEFICIENT RATS
V. Arce et al., CLONIDINE POTENTIATES THE GROWTH-HORMONE RESPONSE TO A GROWTH-HORMONERELEASING HORMONE CHALLENGE IN HYPOTHALAMIC GROWTH-HORMONE RELEASING HORMONE-DEFICIENT RATS, Neuroendocrinology, 61(5), 1995, pp. 552-558
This study was designed to further investigate our postulate regarding
the inhibitory role played by central alpha(2)-adrenergic pathways on
hypothalamic somatostatin (SS) release in rats. The growth hormone (G
H) responses to exogenous GH-releasing factor (GRF; 3 mu g/kg i.v.) or
clonidine (CLO; 100 mu g/kg i.v.), either given alone or in combinati
on, were tested in 3-month-old male rats made GH-releasing hormone (GH
-RH) deficient neonatally by administration of monosodium glutamate (M
SG; 4 mg/g body weight s.c.). To prevent the presumable decrease in th
e pituitary GH content in these animals from leading to an erroneous i
nterpretation of the results obtained, half of these rats were given G
RF (MSG-GRF rats; 30 mu g/kg s.c.) for 3 days immediately prior to GH
testing. The other half of MSG-treated and non MSG-treated rats receiv
ed saline during these days (MSG-S and controls, respectively). To est
ablish the efficiency of GRF priming, the pituitary GH content was mea
sured in other MSG-GRF, MSG-S, and control animals. The mean (+/- SEM)
GH peaks in response to GRF challenge were significantly higher in co
ntrols than in MSG-GRF rats (125.2 +/- 28.5 vs. 67.5 +/- 19.4 mu g/l;
p < 0.05), while no significant GRF-induced GH release was observed in
the MSG-S group. Most likely these results are related to the differe
nt pituitary GH content, significantly (p < 0.01) higher in controls t
han in MSG-GRF rats, and in the latter higher than in MSG-S animals (p
< 0.05). CLO administration did not evoke a significant GH release in
MSG rats, whether primed with GRF or not. The maximal GH peak in resp
onse to the alpha(2)-adrenergic agonist (25 +/- 3.2 mu g/l) in control
s was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that elicited by GRF. Pretre
atment with CLO significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced the GH response to G
RF in control (640.6 +/- 57.9 mu g/l) and in MSG-GRF rats (324.3 +/- 7
6.4 mu g/l), but it produced no effect in MSG-S animals. These results
indicate that alpha(2)-adrenergic agonism is able to potentiate the G
H response to GRF in GH-RH-deficient rats. Since we have reported a si
milar synergistic effect in rats exhibiting pharmacologically increase
d SS release, it can be concluded that, in this species, CLO acts by i
nhibiting the hypothalamic release of SS rather than by stimulating en
dogenous GH-RH release.