According to Johnson and Eagly (1989), outcome-relevant involvement (O
RI) occurs when an attitude is activated that is concerned with import
ant outcomes, whereas value-relevant involvement (VRI) occurs when an
attitude is activated that is concerned with important values. To test
this distinction between ORI and VRI, the present experiment manipula
ted the extent that subjects experienced VRI instead of ORI with respe
ct to the implementation of comprehensive exams at their university. N
ext, subjects read either weak or strong arguments in favour of the im
plementation of comprehensive exams. In addition, subjects were placed
in either a low involvement or high involvement condition by telling
them either that the exams may be implemented at their university next
year (high involvement) or that the exams may be implemented in five
years (low involvement). Subjects then indicated their attitude toward
the comprehensive exams. When analyses were limited to those subjects
who should be most affected by the manipulations, namely those who co
nsidered outcomes or values to be important (88% of the sample), the t
hree-way interaction between type of involvement, level of involvement
, and argument strength was significant. This interaction supported th
e importance of distinguishing between ORI and VRI.