Theory: Voters in a primary or caucus are unlikely to invest substanti
al personal resources in making their choice, but at the same time the
ir choice-problem is complex. A mixed model of choice is presented wit
h two steps: an elimination step that reduces the field of candidates
considered seriously by the voter, and an expected-utility step that i
nvolves comparisons of the candidates in the reduced ''decision set.''
Hypotheses: Voters use party affiliation, visibility, and viability t
o narrow the field of candidates. They then compare the expected-utili
ty gains of electing any of the remaining candidates. If no clear pref
erence emerges, voters consider their affect for the candidates and re
consider viability. Methods: We have written a computer algorithm to s
imulate the decision model for potential caucus and primary voters ear
ly in the 1988 nomination campaign. A significant strength of this sim
ulation technique is that it allows us to model choice across all 7 De
mocratic and 6 Republican candidates. Results: The elimination step ha
s a powerful effect in narrowing the field of candidates for nominatio
n participants. Overall, the model accurately predicts choice across t
he options voters faced early in the 1988 nomination season.