This article summarizes the basic formulation of two well-established
finite element model (FEM) updating techniques for improved dynamic an
alysis, namely the response function method (RFM) and the inverse eige
nsensitivity method (IESM). Emphasis is placed on the similarities in
their mathematical formulation, numerical treatment, and on the unique
ness of the resulting updated models. Three case studies that include
welded L-plate specimens, a car exhaust system, and a highway bridge w
ere examined in some detail and measured vibration data were used thro
ughout the investigation. It was experimentally observed that signific
ant dynamic behavior discrepancies existed between some of the nominal
ly identical structures, a feature that makes the task of model updati
ng even more difficult because no unequivocal reference data exist in
this particular case. Although significant improvements were obtained
in all cases where the updating of the FE model was possible, it was f
ound that the success of the updated models depended very heavily on t
he parameters used, such as the selection and number of the frequency
points for RFM, and the selection of modes and the balancing of the se
nsitivity matrix for IESM. Finally, the performance of the two methods
was compared from general applicability, numerical stability, and com
putational effort standpoints. (C) 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.