S. Cvitanovic et al., SPECIFIC HYPOSENSITIZATION IN PATIENTS ALLERGIC TO PARIETARIA-OFFICINALIS POLLEN ALLERGEN, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology, 4(6), 1994, pp. 283-290
The effects of specific hyposensitization in 40 patients with Parietar
ia officinalis-sensitive seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis were studied dur
ing three years of treatment. The patients were treated with subcutane
ous injections of a new, partially purified, characterized and standar
dized pollen extract of P. officinalis allergen (alum-absorbed depot p
reparation). Treatment was applied from November to mid March and it w
as clinically assessed during the plant flowering season (mid March to
end of June). Laboratory tests were performed yearly when beginning a
nd ending treatment. Serum concentrations of P. officinalis pollen all
ergen-specific IgE antibodies decreased (first year- from 18.7 +/- 7.7
to 17.9 +/- 7.6 PRU/ml; second year: from 16.3 +/- 7.1 to 14.1 +/- 6.
6 PRU/ml; third year from 12.3 +/- 5.6 to 10.9 +/- 5.6 PRU/ml) and tho
se of specific IgG increased (first year: from 15.3 +/- 13.2 to 21.7 /- 14.0%; second year from 28.5 +/- 13.0 to 36.3 +/- 15.9%; third year
from 29.9 +/- 14.1 to 38.9 +/- 16.8%) during the treatment. Histamine
release from peripheral blood leukocytes challenged in vitro with the
allergen decreased during the three years of the treatment (first yea
r from 42.3 +/- 13.0 to 33.1 +/- 10.8%; second year from 31.9 +/- 11.9
to 19.1 +/- 8.5%; thirdyear from 19.4 +/- 4.6 to 14.3 +/- 4.60%), whe
reas the size of skin test reaction and the percentage of eosinophils
among white blood cells remained unchanged. Clinically, both symptom a
nd additional medication scores significantly decreased in the treated
patients in the second (symptom score 3.4 +/- 2.3; additional medicat
ion score 2.1 +/- 1.7) and third (symptom score 2.1 +/- 1.7; additiona
l medication score 1.4 +/- 0.8) year as compared to their own referenc
e values obtained in the first year of treatment (symptom score 4.7 +/
- 3.6; additional medication score 2.5 +/- 1.8). Clinical improvement
was found in 67.5% of patients in symptom score, and in 47.5% in addit
ional medication score. These scores were also significantly lower tha
n in patients treated with ketotifen.