Bg. Taal et al., ASSESSMENT OF SUCRALFATE COATING BY SEQUENTIAL SCINTIGRAPHIC IMAGING IN RADIATION-INDUCED ESOPHAGEAL LESIONS, Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 41(2), 1995, pp. 109-114
The value of mucosal protection with sucralfate in cases of gastric ul
ceration is well documented. Although sucralfate is advocated as treat
ment of esophageal lesions, we found it to be of limited value in the
management of radiation-induced esophagitis; in a pilot study of 10 ca
ses, minor relief of symptoms, with analgetics still required, was not
ed in 4 patients, and no improvement was seen at endoscopy after 6 wee
ks of treatment in any patient. To see if this might be the result of
inadequate mucosal coating, we administered sucralfate labeled with te
chnetium 99m to 26 patients with endoscopically proven esophagitis sec
ondary to irradiation for esophageal carcinoma. The degree of coating
was evaluated according to persistence of the radionuclide in the affe
cted esophageal segment. Scans were performed at regular intervals for
120 minutes after administration of 150 MBq Tc-99m-sucralfate. Althou
gh scans were positive for radioactivity in 24 of 26 (99%) patients, o
nly 8 (31%) of these represented selective binding of sucralfate to ti
ssue. In the other 16 cases, scans were positive for sucralfate and al
bumin, indicating nonspecific retention most likely caused by concomit
ant esophageal stenosis. Residual radioactivity was observed for 30 mi
nutes or more in 11 (42%) patients, but scans were positive for radioa
ctivity after 1 to 2 hours in only 4 (15%). The duration and intensity
of tracer accumulation were similar in both acute lesions and chronic
radiation damage. These findings suggest that the inability of sucral
fate to alleviate irradiation-induced odynophagia may be related to in
sufficient duration of adherence of this compound to damaged esophagea
l mucosa.