RELIABILITY COMPARISON OF 2 METALLURGIES FOR CERAMIC BALL GRID ARRAY

Citation
Dr. Banks et al., RELIABILITY COMPARISON OF 2 METALLURGIES FOR CERAMIC BALL GRID ARRAY, IEEE transactions on components, packaging, and manufacturing technology. Part B, Advanced packaging, 18(1), 1995, pp. 53-57
Citations number
7
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Eletrical & Electronic","Engineering, Manufacturing","Material Science
ISSN journal
10709894
Volume
18
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
53 - 57
Database
ISI
SICI code
1070-9894(1995)18:1<53:RCO2MF>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Surface-mountable ceramic ball grid array (CBGA) packages have proven to be attractive in a variety of applications as designers seek to max imize electrical performance, reduce card real estate, and improve man ufacturing process yields. In support of the PowerPC(TM) family of mic roprocessors, 21 mm CBGA packages (256 leads) were used to evaluate tw o different ball metallurgies-90/10 Pb/Sn and 62/36/2 Sn/Pb/Ag. Test m odules were assembled to printed circuit cards and cycled at 0 to 100 degrees C and -40 to 125 degrees C to evaluate the relative fatigue be havior of the interconnections. Ball attach techniques and module-to-c ard assembly processes are described, including screening, placement, and reflow. Failure mechanisms and fatigue reliability are discussed f or both metallurgies.