TUBAL VERSUS UTERINE TRANSFER OF CRYOPRESERVED EMBRYOS - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL

Citation
Bj. Vanvoorhis et al., TUBAL VERSUS UTERINE TRANSFER OF CRYOPRESERVED EMBRYOS - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL, Fertility and sterility, 63(3), 1995, pp. 578-583
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00150282
Volume
63
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
578 - 583
Database
ISI
SICI code
0015-0282(1995)63:3<578:TVUTOC>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Objective: To compare pregnancy rates after fallopian tubal and uterin e transfer of cryopreserved embryos. Design: Prospective randomized tr ial with assignment to treatment groups by a random number table. Sett ing: University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, a tertiary care academi c institution. Patients: Forty patients with patent fallopian tubes an d at least three cryopreserved embryos. Interventions: Cryopreserved e mbryos were thawed and transferred to the fallopian tube by laparoscop y or to the uterus by a transcervical catheter. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates. Results: Tubal transfer of cryo preserved embryos resulted in statistically higher clinical (68% versu s 24%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (58% Versus 19%) when compared with uterine transfer. Conclusions: Tubal transfer of cryopreserved embryo s is highly effective and offers an improved pregnancy rate when compa red with uterine transfer of embryos. This method of transfer should b e considered in patients with patent fallopian tubes and at least thre e cryopreserved embryos.