Objective: To define the clinical significance of tubal ostium membran
es. Design: Retrospective multivariate stepwise logistic regression an
alysis. Setting: Algemene Kliniek Sint-Jan, Brussels, Belgium. Patient
s: Three thousand forty-six hysteroscopies on 2979 patients, including
172 with infertility, over a 9-year period. Main Outcome Measures: Pr
esence of tubal ostium membranes, age, infertility, endometrial thickn
ess, and hormonal environment. Results: Tubal ostial membranes were pr
esent in 74 (2.5%) patients: they were unilateral in 30 (42.1%) and bi
lateral in 44 (57.9%). Their presence was independent from hormonal st
ate and from endometrial thickness. The incidence of ostial membranes
was significantly higher (9.9%) in patients referred for infertility f
or unilateral (3.5%) as well as for bilateral presence (6.4%). Only th
e bilateral form was age dependent. Conclusions: Tubal ostium membrane
s may be one of the unknown limiting factors affecting female fertilit
y and thus reducing the monthly fecundity rate. The present data sugge
st that bilateral and unilateral tubal ostium membranes may have a dif
ferent clinical significance. The unilateral form is unrelated to age,
hormonal state, or endometrial thickness and can be congenital. This
form is most clearly related to infertility. The bilateral form is les
s related to infertility, is found in women of older age, and can be a
cquired. Further prospective analysis is needed to clarify the pathoge
nesis and pathophysiology of tubal ostium membranes. Tubal ostium memb
ranes should routinely be looked for when performing a hysteroscopic e
xamination in infertile women.