It is frequently difficult to identify and localize organic intraorbit
al foreign bodies despite modern day high-resolution imaging studies.
Although there can be grave complications associated with retention of
organic intraorbital foreign bodies, many believe that removal of suc
h bodies in most cases is unwarranted. A high clinical suspicion, prop
er choice of imaging studies, and removal by a skilled orbital surgeon
probably make the risk of surgical exploration and foreign body remov
al less than the risk of foreign body retention. We present a case of
an intraorbital wood foreign body that required two separate explorati
ons for retrieval. An initial intraconal exploration failed to locate
the foreign body. Although the clinical suspicion was high, the imagin
g studies were equivocal, complicating the management. A second explor
ation yielded a large intraorbital wooden foreign body in the inferior
extraconal space, The patient fully recovered and regained visual acu
ity of 20/20. The evaluation of such patients and details of managemen
t strategy are discussed.