Ssd. Fernando et Kb. Saunders, VENTILATORY SENSITIVITY TO SINGLE BREATHS OF CO2 AROUND THE CONTROL POINT IN MAN, Respiration physiology, 99(2), 1995, pp. 205-214
We used single inspiratory capacity breaths of 5, 6 or 8% CO2 in air t
o obtain ventilatory responses in normal subjects, with ensemble avera
ging of repeated runs to define stimulus and response (Protocol 1). We
also compared the effect of an inspiratory capacity (IC) breath of 8%
CO2 with that of two tidal volumes (TV) at the same concentration (Pr
otocol 2). The ventilatory response was defined first as the ratio of
peak changes in ventilation and end-tidal P-CO2, and secondly by the r
atio of their integrals. We obtained group mean values of 0.21 L min(-
1) mmHg(-1) for the peak method and 0.80 1, min(-1) mmHg(-1) for integ
rals (Protocol 1). There was no significant difference between IC and
TV response values (Protocol 2) either by the peak method (0.17 vs 0.1
9 L min(-1) mmHg(-1)) or by integrals (0.47 vs 0.53 L min(-1) mmHg(-1)
). A significant decrease in ventilation was seen in the second tidal
Volume 8% CO2 breath, even though the stimulus was unperceived by four
out of live subjects. CO2 responses can be obtained from these techni
ques, but the necessary analysis is too cumbersome for general use. Ta
king a deep breath had no detectable separate effect, but CO2 in the a
irway may depress ventilation even at concentrations which the subject
cannot detect.