Zn. Kain et al., PARENTAL PRESENCE DURING INDUCTION OF ANESTHESIA - THE SURGEONS PERSPECTIVE, European journal of pediatric surgery, 6(6), 1996, pp. 323-327
Parental presence during induction of anesthesia (PPIA) remains contro
versial and little is known about surgeons' attitudes toward this clin
ical practice. A questionnaire was mailed to all the United States (US
) members of the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatric
s and all members of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons. Q
uestions were asked about attitudes toward PPIA in the operating room
and the prevalence of such practice. A total of 275 subjects, constitu
ting 72.4% of the compared groups, responded after three mailings. Six
ty percent of the US respondents and 95% of the Great Britain (GB) res
pondents said they disagree with the statement ''parents should never
be present during induction of anesthesia''. Ninety-two percent of the
GB respondents and 69% of the US respondents thought PPIA decreases a
nxiety (p = 0.001) and increases the cooperation of the child (86% GB,
versus 53% US, p = 0.001). Most US respondents (72%) reported that PP
IA occurs in less than 25% of their cases, but most GB respondents (80
%) reported PPIA in more than 75% of their cases (p = 0.001). These di
fferences in prevalence persisted after logistic-regression models wer
e used to adjust for potential confounding demographic variables. We c
onclude that the attitudes and practice toward PPIA held by surgeons f
rom the US and GB differ significantly While a large percentage of the
US sample agree that there are benefits in PPIA, only a minority repo
rt the routine use of PPIA in contrast to most respondents from GB who
report PPIA as routine in their hospital.