THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF WATER BETA-CYCLODEXTRIN DODECYLSURFACTANTTERNARY-SYSTEMS

Citation
S. Milioto et al., THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF WATER BETA-CYCLODEXTRIN DODECYLSURFACTANTTERNARY-SYSTEMS, Journal of solution chemistry, 24(2), 1995, pp. 103-120
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Physical
ISSN journal
00959782
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
103 - 120
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-9782(1995)24:2<103:TPOWBD>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Densities, heat capacities and conductivities of water-surfactant-beta -cyclodextrin (beta-CD) ternary systems were determined at 25-degrees- C. The surfactants studied were sodium dodecylsulfate (NaDS) and dodec yltrimethyl-ammonium bromide (DTAB). From conductivity data, apparent critical micelle concentrations (cmc) and degree of ionization of mic elles were obtained at a fixed beta-CD concentration (m(CD)). From the cmc value and that in water (cmc) the stoichiometry of the surfactan t-beta-CD complex was calculated. At a given m(CD), the apparent molar volume V(phi,CD) and heat capacity C(phi,CD) of beta-CD in the two su rfactants were calculated as functions of surfactant concentration m(S ). For both NaDS and DTAB, V(phi,CD) increases with m(S) up to about t he cmc beyond which it decreases to a constant value at high m(S); the opposite is observed for C(phi,CD). With NaDS, a jump in the C(phi,CD ) vs. m(S) trend was detected and ascribed to a structural NaDS micell ar transition. The apparent molar volume V(phiS) and heat capacity C(p hiS) of NaDS and DTAB in the water-beta-CD mixture 0.017m were also ob tained. From these properties and those in pure water, the volume DELT AV(S) and heat capacity DELTAC(S) of transfer of the surfactant from w ater to water+beta-CD mixture as functions of m(S) were calculated. Fo r both surfactants, the DELTAV(S) vs. m(S) trends increase to the cmc and then decrease in a monotonic manner, whereas DELTAC(S) increases r egularly with m(S) in the pre-micellar region and is essentially const ant in the post-micellar region. The DELTAV(S) vs. m(S) trends were qu alitatively explained in terms of dispersed, complexed and micellized surfactant contributions.