This paper explores what we might mean by the terms ''humanism'' and '
'the ecological perspective'' using a new kind of systems model. It is
argued that humanism represents an uncritical acceptance of boundarie
s that always priortise individual human beings, human societies and/o
r human communicative systems in analyses. The contention is that this
can no longer be considered legitimate. If an uncritically prioritise
d boundary is always placed around the human element, then that which
is seen as lying beyond the human boundary (our ''environment'') will
inevitably be marginalised, and will come to be regarded as profane. W
hat is profane is subject to abuse, much of which is ritualised. Becau
se we now realise that there is no real separation between ''us'' (hum
an beings) and ''it'' (the environment), this is not 'just' environmen
tal abuse - it is self-abuse. Our ''selves'' are wider than the uncrit
ically prioritised boundaries of our human bodies. We therefore have t
o look for an alternative to humanism. One such alternative is the eco
logical perspective which allows choice between boundaries and refuses
to prioritise the human element uncritically.