Seaton and Cordey-Hayes [1] have drawn attention to many of the limita
tions and deficiencies in traditional technology transfer mechanisms.
They argued that this was largely due to the dominance of the linear m
odel of innovation on conventional thinking. Furthermore, they present
ed an alternative model of technology transfer (accessibility-mobility
-receptivity) which emphasized the interactive nature of the process a
nd highlighted the absence of any substantial research within the area
of receptivity. This paper continues from that 1993 paper and focuses
on the concept of 'receptivity' in the context of inward technology t
ransfer. A conceptual framework is developed which identifies four maj
or components of the inward technology transfer process. These are: 'a
wareness', 'association', 'assimilation' and 'application'. Using this
conceptual device, a series of studies is conducted within a number o
f businesses within ICI Chemicals and Polymers Ltd. The conclusions in
dicate the importance of non-routine activities and effective communic
ations between credible boundary-spanning individuals. These are key a
spects of the assimilation of new knowledge and the inward transfer pr
ocess. This requires successful organizations not only to be efficient
and competitive at their routine business in order to survive in the
short term, but also to make room for opportunities for these creative
, non-routine assimilation processes, which are more stochastic in nat
ure, if they are to remain competitive in the long term.