DOES IMPAIRED TRANSCELLULAR WATER TRANSPORT CONTRIBUTE TO NET ULTRAFILTRATION FAILURE DURING CAPD

Citation
Mcj. Monquil et al., DOES IMPAIRED TRANSCELLULAR WATER TRANSPORT CONTRIBUTE TO NET ULTRAFILTRATION FAILURE DURING CAPD, Peritoneal dialysis international, 15(1), 1995, pp. 42-48
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
ISSN journal
08968608
Volume
15
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
42 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
0896-8608(1995)15:1<42:DITWTC>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the contribution of transcellular water transpor t in net ultrafiltration failure during continuous ambulatory peritone al dialysis (CAPD). Design: Retrospective. Setting: Renal Unit, Academ ic Medical Center, Amsterdam. Patients: One group of 6 patients with c linical severe ultrafiltration loss and a group of 10 stable CAPD pati ents without ultrafiltration problems. Intervention: In all patients, two peritoneal permeability tests were done within one week, using glu cose 1.36% dialysate on one day and glucose 3.86% on the other day. De xtran 70 was used as a volume marker. Results: The difference in net u ltrafiltration between 3.86% glucose and 1.36% glucose dialysate was 5 69+/-51 ml (control) and 153+/-103 mL (poor ultrafiltration group; p < 0.005). The dialysate/plasma (D/P) concentration ratios increased in both groups with glucose 1.36%. When using 3.86% glucose, the D/P rati o decreased in the control group with a median minimum value one hour after completion of inflow. It is possible that sieving of sodium was due to transcellular water transport by crystalloid osmosis during the hypertonic dwell, as a dissociation between the transport of water an d sodium is unlikely to occur in transport through the much larger int ercellular pores. The D/P sodium ratio after one hour was related to t he mass transfer area coefficient (MTC) of creatinine and the percenta ge of glucose absorption in the control group. No decrease in D/P rati o was found in the poor ultrafiltration group. This suggests impairmen t of transcellular water transport. No significant differences were pr esent between both groups with regard to MTC creatinine (10.2 and 14.0 mL/min), glucose absorption (71% and 71%), effective lymphatic absorp tion rate (1.34 and 1.01 mL/min), and residual volume(248 and 178 mL). Only 1 patient in the ultrafiltration loss group continued with CAPD. The others had to be transferred to hemodialysis; 1 of them developed sclerosing peritonitis. Conclusion: The sieving of sodium during CAPD may be caused by transcellular water transport. Deficient sieving as assessed by the absence of a decreased D/P ratio after one hour of a h ypertonic dwell suggests impairment of transcellular water transport. This is associated with severe ultrafiltration failure. It indicates t hat failure of transcellular water transport, possibly by glycosylatio n of specific proteins on the cell membrane, may be considered one of the causes of ultrafiltration failure during CAPD.