Objective: To familiarize the surgeon with problem-based learning (PBL
) and to discuss the current and future role of PBL in undergraduate s
urgical education. Data Sources: Two meta-analyses comparing the outco
me of a PBL curriculum with a traditional curriculum and other studies
in the English-language literature. Study Selection: Data on the effe
ctiveness of PBL can best be assessed by a meta-analysis in which the
conclusions of many studies are reviewed and combined to provide a mor
e comprehensive picture. The studies chosen represent those from the o
nly two recent meta-analyses of the problem that have appeared in repu
table journals. Data Extraction: Results reported are those obtained u
sing appropriate techniques and published in reputable journals. Infor
mation relevant to the major issues in undergraduate surgical training
was selected for inclusion. Data Synthesis: PBL depends on self-direc
ted learning, triggered by a clinical problem. The students meet in sm
all groups led by a facilitator and discuss carefully designed clinica
l cases. At the conclusion, the students will have encountered all the
information necessary to solve the case and, in so doing, will have g
ained knowledge that in a conventional curriculum would usually have b
een disseminated by lecture. There were only small differences between
graduates from the two types of curricula. Those from a PBL curriculu
m had comparable examination results to those from a traditional curri
culum on both basic science and clinically based examinations but were
happier with their educational experiences. Conclusions: Centres that
have adopted a PBL approach have found improved student motivation an
d enjoyment, but there has been no convincing evidence of improved lea
rning. An intelligent combination of both traditional and PBL approach
es will likely provide the most effective training for undergraduate s
urgical clerks.