Mdk. Horne et al., VENOGRAPHIC SURVEILLANCE OF TUNNELED VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES IN ADULT ONCOLOGY PATIENTS, Annals of surgical oncology, 2(2), 1995, pp. 174-178
Background: Tunneled venous access devices (VADs) are often essential
in the care of patients with advanced malignancies, but they carry an
uncertain risk of thrombosis. Methods: To determine the incidence of v
enoocclusion related to silicone VADs in a population of adult oncolog
y patients, we prospectively studied 50 individuals with upper extremi
ty venograms similar to 6 weeks after their VADs had been implanted. T
wenty-one of these patients were reevaluated with venograms similar to
12 weeks after catheterization. In addition, venograms were performed
on a separate group of 24 patients who needed catheterization of axil
lary-subclavian veins that had been catheterized in the past. Results:
The 6-week venograms in the prospective study showed partial venous o
bstruction in 15 patients (30%), whereas three (6%) had developed symp
tomatic total venoocclusion by this time. The 12-week venograms showed
two additional complete occlusions, Venograms of 30 previously cathet
erized veins showed complete venoocclusion in nine (30%), although onl
y two had a history of thrombosis. Conclusions: Our observations indic
ate that VADs frequently cause partial venoocclusion within the first
6 weeks of catheterization and that permanent venous damage from VADs
is common, even without a history of VAD-related thrombosis.