VENOGRAPHIC SURVEILLANCE OF TUNNELED VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES IN ADULT ONCOLOGY PATIENTS

Citation
Mdk. Horne et al., VENOGRAPHIC SURVEILLANCE OF TUNNELED VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES IN ADULT ONCOLOGY PATIENTS, Annals of surgical oncology, 2(2), 1995, pp. 174-178
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
10689265
Volume
2
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
174 - 178
Database
ISI
SICI code
1068-9265(1995)2:2<174:VSOTVA>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: Tunneled venous access devices (VADs) are often essential in the care of patients with advanced malignancies, but they carry an uncertain risk of thrombosis. Methods: To determine the incidence of v enoocclusion related to silicone VADs in a population of adult oncolog y patients, we prospectively studied 50 individuals with upper extremi ty venograms similar to 6 weeks after their VADs had been implanted. T wenty-one of these patients were reevaluated with venograms similar to 12 weeks after catheterization. In addition, venograms were performed on a separate group of 24 patients who needed catheterization of axil lary-subclavian veins that had been catheterized in the past. Results: The 6-week venograms in the prospective study showed partial venous o bstruction in 15 patients (30%), whereas three (6%) had developed symp tomatic total venoocclusion by this time. The 12-week venograms showed two additional complete occlusions, Venograms of 30 previously cathet erized veins showed complete venoocclusion in nine (30%), although onl y two had a history of thrombosis. Conclusions: Our observations indic ate that VADs frequently cause partial venoocclusion within the first 6 weeks of catheterization and that permanent venous damage from VADs is common, even without a history of VAD-related thrombosis.