DETECTION OF MIXED CHIMERISM AND LEUKEMIC RELAPSE AFTER ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN SUBPOPULATIONS OF LEUKOCYTES BY FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION IN COMBINATION WITH THE SIMULTANEOUS IMMUNOPHENOTYPIC ANALYSIS OF INTERPHASE CELLS
G. Kogler et al., DETECTION OF MIXED CHIMERISM AND LEUKEMIC RELAPSE AFTER ALLOGENEIC BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN SUBPOPULATIONS OF LEUKOCYTES BY FLUORESCENT IN-SITU HYBRIDIZATION IN COMBINATION WITH THE SIMULTANEOUS IMMUNOPHENOTYPIC ANALYSIS OF INTERPHASE CELLS, Bone marrow transplantation, 15(1), 1995, pp. 41-48
Serial blood and marrow specimens from eight adult recipients of sex-m
ismatched transplants (BMT) for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 3),
Ewing sarcoma (n = 1), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in second remissi
on (n = 1), acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL, n = 1) and multiple myeloma
(n = 2) were analyzed by the simultaneous immunophenotypic CD3, CD4,
CD8, CD20, CD34, CD10 and genotypic analysis (for X and Y chromosomes)
. This combined technique of moAb/APAAP staining for cell surface and
cytoplasmic antigens and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for
the detection of sex chromosomes allowed the qualitative and quantita
tive evaluation of mixed chimerism and/or relapse. Using the same slid
es for moAb/APAAP and FISH allowed the simultaneous identification of
the cell lineage, the lymphocyte subpopulation and the genotype (XX or
YX) in every blood or BM specimen analyzed. A mixed chimerism in the
T cell (CD4, CD8(+): median 26% host cells, range 5-44%) and in the my
elomonocytic cell population (CD14(+) median 16% host cells, range 5-5
0%) was observed at day +7 after BMT. By days +14 to +18 this mixed ch
imerism was reduced to 18% host T cells (range 5-50%) and 7% host myel
omonocytic cells (range 0-20%). Beyond days +21 to +28 a stable donor
chimerism for T cells, myelomonocytic cells and granulocytes was obser
ved in seven of eight patients. Still 0.5-1% host cells of different l
ineages were detectable in five from the eight patients at later time
points (>day + 100). In three patients with CML these cells were CD13
or CD13, CD34 positive and in one was CD4, CD8 positive. In two patien
ts with common-ALL and multiple myeloma respectively, the host cell le
ukemic relapse expressing the original phenotype was detected at days
+176 and +294, respectively. Thus, this method provides new possibilit
ies for investigating the kinetics of mixed chimerism as well as early
detection of leukemic relapse after BMT.