Objects falling across the physiological blind spot appear ''complete'
' despite the absence of photoreceptors. Completion of objects may occ
ur across the blind spot because (1) the blind spot is filled in with
the background (the associative explanation); (2) the opposite sides o
f the blind spot may be contiguously represented in the cortex (i.e. t
he blind spot is simply sewn up - the retinotopic explanation); or (3)
the blind spot may be sewn up, with compensatory expansion occurring
around the blind spot (the compensation explanation). These theories w
ould predict no size distortions regardless of object size; constant s
ize distortions regardless of object size; and distortions that depend
on the size of the object, respectively. To evaluate these explanatio
ns, we measured size distortions at the blind spot. We measured length
distortions at the blind spot using a criterion-free two-alternative
forced-choice method with feedback. Observers compared the lengths of
test bars presented across the blind spot with lengths of reference ba
rs presented at the corresponding location in the fellow eye. Test bar
lengths ranged from 7-14 deg. Reference bar lengths were in the range
of +/- 3 deg of test bar length. From the observers' responses the pe
rceived length of each bar at the blind spot was estimated. Estimates
of the precision of length discrimination at the blind spot were also
obtained. Our results were consistent with the associative explanation
. In all seven observers, length distortions at the blind spot were sm
aller than 1 deg (<20% of the vertical height of the blind spot) for a
ll bar lengths tested. For bars that were presented across the blind s
pot, the precision with which observers could discriminate length was
comparable to that of normal periphery (Weber fraction approximate to
20%). Both the veridicality and precision of perceived length are pres
erved around the blind spot.