EFFECT OF INTRANASAL AZELASTINE AND BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE ON NASAL SYMPTOMS, NASAL CYTOLOGY, AND BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS TO METHACHOLINE IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS IN RESPONSE TO GRASS POLLENS

Citation
A. Pelucchi et al., EFFECT OF INTRANASAL AZELASTINE AND BECLOMETHASONE DIPROPIONATE ON NASAL SYMPTOMS, NASAL CYTOLOGY, AND BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS TO METHACHOLINE IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS IN RESPONSE TO GRASS POLLENS, Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 95(2), 1995, pp. 515-523
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology,Allergy
ISSN journal
00916749
Volume
95
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
515 - 523
Database
ISI
SICI code
0091-6749(1995)95:2<515:EOIAAB>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
Background: We compared the effect of nasal azelastine (0.56 mg/day), nasal beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP, 200 mu g/day) and matched plac ebo on seasonal symptoms, nasal cytology, and the increase in bronchia l responsiveness occurring during pollen season in a group of subjects with history of allergic rhinitis to grass pollens only. Methods: The study was completed by nine subjects in the azelastine group, 13 subj ects in the BDP group, and 13 subjects in the placebo group. Treatment s were randomly administered for 6 weeks. Each subject recorded daily nasal, eye and chest symptoms and additional treatment requirement for the entire pollen season. Each subject performed nasal lavage 4 weeks into the pollen season. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was measured before and 4 weeks into the pollen season. Response was expre ssed as provocative dose causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volum e in 1 second in micromoles. Results: Azelastine-treated subjects had significantly fewer nasal symptoms during week 4 (p < 0.05), and BDP-t reated subjects had fewer nasal symptoms during week 4 (p < 0.05) and week 5 (p < 0.05) compared with subjects given placebo. Both treatment s significantly reduced the need for additional medications. BDP, but not azelastine, treatment significantly reduced the percent of eosinop hils recovered in nasal lavage (p < 0.05). Neither azelastine nor BDP protected against the increase in bronchial responsiveness to methacho line occurring during the pollen season. Conclusion: We demonstrated t hat both azelastine and BDP are effective treatments for nasal symptom s of seasonal allergic rhinitis after 4 weeks of therapy. However, we were not able to demonstrate an antiinflammatory activity of nasally a dministered azelastine. Nasal therapy with azelastine and BDP did not block the increase in bronchial responsiveness to methacholine caused by seasonal allergen exposure.