J. Paquette et Rj. Reeder, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SURFACE-STRUCTURE, GROWTH-MECHANISM, AND TRACE-ELEMENT INCORPORATION IN CALCITE, Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, 59(4), 1995, pp. 735-749
Crystal growth and coprecipitation experiments demonstrate the manner
in which surface structure and, in turn, crystal structure influence g
rowth mechanism and trace element incorporation in calcite. Dominant {
10 ($) over bar 14} faces grow by the spiral mechanism, producing asym
metric polygonized growth hillocks comprised of two pairs of nonequiva
lent vicinal faces. Trace elements Mg, Mn, and Sr are differentially i
ncorporated into structurally distinct growth steps that comprise the
nonequivalent vicinal faces. The resulting trace element distributions
represent intrasectoral zoning patterns and are found to be consisten
t with face symmetry. Lateral spreading rates are also different for n
onequivalent growth steps at a given degree of supersaturation, and th
e rate anisotropy is dependent on the Ca2+:CO32- ratio in the growth s
olution. A rounding transition associated with changes in kink site de
nsity occurs preferentially on only one pair of equivalent growth step
s, further demonstrating the importance of step-specific kinetics and
affinities on {10 ($) over bar 14} faces. Growth on other forms, inclu
ding {01 ($) over bar 12}, {11 ($) over bar 20}, and {0001}, does not
result in differential partitioning of trace elements and intrasectora
l zoning, which is consistent with each of their surface symmetries an
d allowed growth mechanisms. However, sectoral zoning of Mg, Mn, and S
r occurs between these nonequivalent sectors, as well as {10 ($) over
bar 14}. We present a model detailing the geometry and coordination of
elementary kink sites to explain both the differential incorporation
and the rate anisotropy between nonequivalent growth steps on individu
al {10 ($) over bar 14} faces. The model, constrained by face symmetry
, accounts for affinities of different trace elements among four struc
turally distinct kink sites at which incorporation is preferred. The m
odel also explains the observed differences in growth step velocity, a
s well as the in situ observations of growth step velocities by atomic
force microscopy. Trace element incorporation on the dominant {10 ($)
over bar 14} faces of calcite is controlled by the detailed structure
of the interface, which varies spatially on a face, as well as with e
xternal conditions. Consequently, our observed trace element distribut
ions violate equilibrium partitioning, and it is likely that many trac
e element distributions in natural carbonates also may not reflect equ
ilibrium.