Be. Bleske et al., EFFECT OF VEHICLE ON THE NASAL ABSORPTION OF EPINEPHRINE DURING CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION, Pharmacotherapy, 16(6), 1996, pp. 1039-1045
Study Objectives. We have shown in previous studies that epinephrine a
dministered intranasally is a feasible route of administration during
cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). To promote the absorption of epin
ephrine we administered phentolamine prior to epinephrine and used a b
ile salt as a vehicle to dissolve the epinephrine. The purpose of this
study was to compare the effect of two different vehicles (bile salt
vs surfactant) in promoting the absorption of nasally administered epi
nephrine during CPR and to determine their effects on the nasal mucosa
. Study Design. A randomized, blinded study. Setting. A controlled lab
oratory environment. Subjects. Eleven mongrel dogs. Interventions. Eac
h dog underwent 3 minutes of unassisted ventricular fibrillation (VF)
followed by 7 minutes of VF with CPR. Five minutes after the start of
VF, 10 dogs received intranasal phentolamine 0.25 mg/kg/nostril follow
ed 1 minute later by intranasal epinephrine 7.5 mg/kg/nostril. The epi
nephrine was dissolved in a randomly assigned vehicle consisting of ei
ther taurodeoxycholic acid (group A, bile salt) or polyoxyethylene-9-l
auryl ether (group B, surfactant). One animal acted as a control and r
eceived 0.9% sodium chloride nasally. Measurements and Main Results. D
ata from eight dogs (one control) were included for analysis. Histolog
y of the nasal cavity demonstrated severe multifocal erosion and ulcer
ation of the respiratory epithelium for groups A and B compared with t
he control. The severity was similar between the two groups. In additi
on, no significant differences in plasma epinephrine concentrations or
blood pressure responses were seen between the groups. Conclusion. Ba
sed on histology, polyoxyethylene-9-lauryl ether offered no advantage
over taurodeoxycholic acid in its effect on the nasal mucosa. The data
available for changes in epinephrine concentration and pressure also
suggest no difference between the two vehicles in promoting the absorp
tion of epinephrine during CPR in an animal model.