In a paper published in 1974, it was reported that uro-oxalic stones a
re found more often in subjects with group O than with group A blood t
ypes although the proportions of these two blood types are approximate
ly equivalent in the French population. The present work confirms thes
e data, the ratio of group O to group A renal lithiasis being approxim
ately 3 to 1. In a paper published in 1987, uro-oxalic stones were fou
nd to occur preferentially on the left side: 84 on the left and 39 on
the right. The present work confirms this notion since in 57 cases, st
ones were bilateral in 2 cases, on the left in 39 and on the right in
16. Extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy was performed in 40 of the
57 cases and showed that uro-oxalic stones are most resistant to shock
-waves than the other types of stones, They are about as hard as calci
um oxalate monohydrate stones or harder in certain cases: A mean of 3
865 shock-waves were required in the 40 cases of the uro-oxalic lithia
sis treated with the HM3 Dornier device, while the mean number of shoc
k-waves required for all types of stones in general Varies from 2 000
to 2 500. In 4 cases, 5 000 or 6 000 high power shock-waves (7 000 in
one session and 9 500 in two sessions) had to be used to obtain a sati
sfactory result. The calcium oxalate part of these stones is almost al
ways composed of calcium oxalate monohydrate. The uric acid part is in
general composed of anhydrous or bihydrated uric acid or red or yello
w-red sodium urate. In the last series, white ammonium rate stones wer
e spontaneously expelled whole or after lithotripsy fragmentation in p
atients without any important infection. The proportion of uro-oxalic
stones, compared with all nephritic stones, was in 1974 approximately
5% nearly identical to that of uric acid stones. In 1994, the proporti
on of uro-oxalic stones reached 9.8% and the proportion of uric acid s
tones fell to 2%. These observations raise important genetic, pathogen
ic and therapeutic questions.