A survey was made of 155 anesthesiology residency programs in the Unit
ed States to determine the patterns of use, responsibility for interpr
etation, and training of those responsible for intraoperative transeso
phageal echocardiography (TEE). Survey questions included numbers and
types of cases for which TEE is used, who interprets TEE data and how
they are trained, the extent of resident training in TEE, and beliefs
about the utility of TEE. One hundred eight completed surveys were ret
urned (70% response). Of those responding, 98 (91%) use intraoperative
TEE. In 53 of those 98 institutions (54%), an anesthesiologist was pr
imarily responsible for the interpretation of TEE data, whereas a card
iologist was responsible in the remainder. Approximately 35% of anesth
esiologists using TEE had training in its use during residency or fell
owship; the remainder were trained after finishing residency or fellow
ship. Forty-two percent of anesthesiologists who use TEE leave a forma
l interpretation on the chart apart from the anesthesia record, and 43
% bill specifically for performing TEE. Although 69% of those respondi
ng thought that formal credentials should be required for anesthesiolo
gists to use intraoperative TEE, only 32% reported that their institut
ions actually mandated this. 38% of those responding stated that they
offer a dedicated TEE rotation to their residents, and 13% thought tha
t their graduating residents were trained well enough to use TEE on th
eir own. Among academic institutions responding, the use of intraopera
tive TEE is nearly universal, responsibility for its interpretation is
split almost evenly between cardiologists and anesthesiologists, and
there is a disparity between opinions and reality with regard to TEE c
redentialing for anesthesiologists.