Li. Huschtscha et al., CELL-DEATH BY APOPTOSIS FOLLOWING ANTICANCER DRUG-TREATMENT IN-VITRO, International journal of oncology, 6(3), 1995, pp. 585-593
The mechanism of cell death, apoptosis or necrosis, was determined mor
phologically and by DNA gel electrophoresis in 3 human leukaemic T-cel
l lines (CCRF-CEM.f2, CCRF-HSB and MOLT.4) after treatment with cytoto
xic drugs. These include one hormone, dexamethasone (DXM); the DNA dam
aging agents, melphalan, cisplatin, bleomycin, mitomycin C and mithram
ycin; inhibitors of DNA synthesis, aphidicolin, cytosine arabinoside (
Ara-C), methotrexate (MTX), 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) and 5-fluo
rouracil (5-FU); and other metabolic inhibitors, bromo-2'-deoxy-2'-uri
dine (BUdR), actinomycin D, 5-azacytidine (5-AC), cycloheximide, vincr
istine, etoposide and adriamycin. When cell death was assessed morphol
ogically apoptotic cell death was apparent in the three cell lines 48
hours after all drug treatments. However, a distinct pattern of DNA br
eakdown was observed for each cell line. A smear of DNA on agarose gel
s was seen for CCRF-CEM.f2 with 5-FU and mithramycin treatments whilst
CCRF-HSB cells showed a similar DNA profile after 5-FU and MTX treatm
ents. All drug treatments of MOLT.4 cells produced a necrotic pattern
of DNA degradation. Cycloheximide, an inhibitor of protein synthesis r
educed DNA fragmentation of CCRF-CEM.f2 cells treated with DXM, MTX an
d FUdR indicating that protein synthesis is required for cytotoxicity
by apoptosis. However, the extent of DNA fragmentation caused by 5-FU
was not significantly affected by cycloheximide. These results indicat
e that at least morphological and electrophoretic criteria should be u
sed to avoid differing conclusions about modes of cell death.