COMPARING CHOICE AND QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURES OF THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ASTAFF TRAINING PROCEDURE

Citation
Dh. Reid et Mb. Parsons, COMPARING CHOICE AND QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURES OF THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ASTAFF TRAINING PROCEDURE, Journal of applied behavior analysis, 28(1), 1995, pp. 95-96
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
00218855
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
95 - 96
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8855(1995)28:1<95:CCAQMO>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
We compared questionnaire and choice measures of acceptability while e valuating effects of staff familiarity versus unfamiliarity with the s ystem used to monitor performance during a training program. Staff mem bers rated both monitoring formats equally favorably on the questionna ire, whereas when given a choice, they frequently chose the familiar f ormat and never chose the unfamiliar format. These results suggest tha t traditional questionnaire evaluations may not be sufficiently sensit ive measures of acceptability relative to choice measures.