DIAGNOSIS OF CANINE ECHINOCOCCOSIS - COMPARISON OF COPROANTIGEN AND SERUM ANTIBODY TESTS WITH ARECOLINE PURGATION IN URUGUAY

Citation
Ps. Craig et al., DIAGNOSIS OF CANINE ECHINOCOCCOSIS - COMPARISON OF COPROANTIGEN AND SERUM ANTIBODY TESTS WITH ARECOLINE PURGATION IN URUGUAY, Veterinary parasitology, 56(4), 1995, pp. 293-301
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Parasitiology,"Veterinary Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
03044017
Volume
56
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
293 - 301
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-4017(1995)56:4<293:DOCE-C>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Echinococcus granulosus is one of the most important and widespread of the helminth zoonoses. Diagnosis off. granulosus infection in dogs cu rrently relies on arecoline dosing and detailed examination of the pur ge for adult worms. Two immunodiagnostic tests (ELISA) based on genus specific coproantigen detection or serum antibody (IgG, IgA and IgE) d etection were compared against arecoline purgation for the detection o f Echinococcus in naturally infected dogs in Uruguay. The coproantigen ELISA had a sensitivity of 76.9% compared with 34.6% for the serum Ig G ELISA when assessed against 26 purge positive dogs (purge worm count range 1-4331). Coproantigen reactivity was positively correlated (r = 0.65) to purge worm count, with a threshold at over 20 worms. There w as no positive correlation of antibody levels with worm counts. In 26 matched Echinococcus positive dog samples, the overall sensitivity of serological detection increased to 69.2% when seroreactivity for IgA a nd IgE antibodies were included and to 96.2% for both coproantigen and antibody assays combined. The detection of current infection of indiv idual dogs with E. granulosus by coproantigen ELISA has the potential to replace arecoline purgation, while specific serum antibody detectio n should be useful in assessing Echinococcus exposure in dog populatio ns.