One hundred consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy
for suspected appendicitis were evaluated to assess the appropriate cl
inical setting for laparoscopic appendectomy. The usefulness of diagno
stic laparoscopy in the setting of acute abdominal pain has been well
documented. However, there is debate about the use of laparoscopy for
definitive therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the decis
ion making process during diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendi
citis. When pathology is identified other than in the appendix, the ma
jority of patients can be treated without converting to an open proced
ure. In patients found to have no obvious pathology, incidental append
ectomy can be performed laparoscopically. When appendicitis was identi
fied, the majority of patients could be treated safely without convert
ing to an open technique. However, there were certain clinical situati
ons that necessitated conversion to an open operation. Involvement of
the cecum or perforation at the base of the appendix puts the appendic
eal stump at risk for leak and abscess formation. Evaluation of the ce
cum by palpation for a mass should also be performed in this situation
. Another situation in which conversion to an open technique is warran
ted is an appendiceal abscess with adherent small bowel. The friabilit
y of bowel wall greatly increases the risk for bowel injury in this se
tting. Laparoscopy is a useful technique for the diagnosis and treatme
nt of abdominal pain even if the appendix is normal on inspection. Con
version to an open operation should be employed when inflammation or p
erforation occurs at the base of the appendix and when bowel is found
to be adherent to an appendiceal abscess.