Abr. Thomson et al., INTRAVENOUS BOLUS VERSUS CONTINUOUS-INFUSION OF FAMOTIDINE OR RANITIDINE ON 24 H INTRAGASTRIC ACIDITY IN FASTING HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS, Canadian journal of gastroenterology, 9(1), 1995, pp. 47-50
Infusions of H2-receptor antagonists may be clinically indicated to ma
intain intragastric pH above 4 to reduce acute gastric mucosal lesions
or to treat patients with bleeding peptic ulcers. Eight fasting healt
hy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive ranitidine infusion al
one (150 mg/day), ranitidine infusion plus 50 mg bolus injection of ra
nitidine (total of 200 mg/day), famotidine infusion alone (40 mg/day)
or famotidine infusion plus 40 mg bolus injection of famotidine (total
of 80 mg/day). Gastric fluid contents were aspirated for 24 h and col
lected as half-hourly samples in which pH measurements were made. Meas
ures analyzed were mean and median pH, percentage pH at or below 3, 4
or 5 for the 24 h period, daytime, evening and nighttime. The data for
each of the variables were analyzed as a Latin square crossover desig
n of variance therapy; base pH before treatment administration in each
crossover phase was employed as the covariant. Significant differenti
al treatment means were tested by Newman-Keul's multiple range test at
the 5% level of significance. The mean and median evening pH were hig
her after famotidine than after ranitidine infusion, but all other pH
readings were similar when using these doses. The addition of an initi
al loading bolus of 50 mg ranitidine to the ranitidine infusion did no
t result in any added differences in pH, whereas the addition of an in
itial loading bolus of 40 mg famotidine to the famotidine infusion res
ulted in a higher 24 h median pH, as well as a lower percentage of pH
values of 4 or below, 16.6% versus 28.5%, P < 0.05. However, the loadi
ng doses of ranitidine and famotidine were not equivalent in potency,
and studies are needed to compare the potency of equivalent doses of r
anitidine and famotidine when given by bolus plus infusion. Also the c
linical relevance of these findings needs to be explored further in th
e type of individuals potentially requiring intravenous H2-receptor an
tagonists.