In order to help determine the risks and benefits, we retrospectively
analyzed the results of our first 114 laparoscopically assisted bowel
procedures. Procedures performed consisted of partial colectomy (85),
total or subtotal abdominal colectomy (8), total proctocolectomy with
J-pouch ileal reservoir(ll), and diverting procedures (10). Forty-nine
procedures were for malignancy. The rate of conversion to laparotomy
was 13.2%. Oral feedings were resumed in 2.4 days (range 1-5), and bow
el function returned in 3.8 days (range 2-8), The average length of st
ay was 4.2 days for partial colectomy and 6 days for total, subtotal,
and proctocolectomy. The mean return to normal activity for all groups
was 16.7 days (10.8 days for partial colectomy), There were no deaths
, Major morbidity (6%) consisted of abscess (3), anastomotic leak (2),
and hemorrhage (1), Mean operative costs analyzed for the initial 37
patients were higher for laparoscopic colectomies when compared to tra
ditional colectomies; however, the mean total hospital costs were less
for the laparoscopic procedures. These data suggest that the laparosc
opic approach to colorectal resection is an acceptable alternative to
laparotomy for a variety of disease processes, allowing patients an ea
rly return to normal activity.