RESPONSES OF HUMAN MASSETER MOTOR UNITS TO STRETCH

Citation
Ts. Miles et al., RESPONSES OF HUMAN MASSETER MOTOR UNITS TO STRETCH, Journal of physiology, 483(1), 1995, pp. 251-264
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Physiology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223751
Volume
483
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
251 - 264
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3751(1995)483:1<251:ROHMMU>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
1. The reflex responses to stretch were studied in single motor units and the surface electromyogram in human masseter. 2. Controlled stretc hes of the isometrically contracting jaw-closing muscles evoked short- latency (10-15 ms) and long-latency (35-70 ms) excitatory reflex respo nses in the masseter surface electromyogram. 3. The majority (65%) of tonically active masseter motor units were excited in both short- and long-latency phases of the reflex. The timing of the stimulus determin ed whether the unit discharged in the short- or long-latency phase. If a non-tonically active motor unit was recruited by the stimulus, it i nvariably discharged in the long-latency phase. 4. Although short-late ncy responses were strongly time-locked to the stimulus, there was ver y Little shortening of interspike intervals (ISIs) in this phase of th e reflex. The shortening of ISIs was more prominent and prolonged duri ng the long-latency phase, which explains why this phase produces most of the reflex force changes following the stretch. 5. Within pairs of concurrently active motor units there was a tenfold range in the size of the short-latency response to the same stretch. 6. A substantial p roportion (35%) of the twenty-two masseter motor units tested had no s tatistically significant short-latency reflex response. 7. In contrast to other human muscles, there was no functional connection between a population of Ia afferents and some masseter motoneurons. There are tw o possible explanations for this result. The short-latency, presumably monosynaptic, Ia afferent inputs may not be uniformly distributed to human masseter motoneurons. Alternatively, these inputs may be subject to tonic presynaptic inhibition that is not uniformly distributed thr oughout the masseter motoneuron pool.