1. The notion that small, 'non-hypotensive' reductions of effective bl
ood volume alter neither arterial pressure nor arterial baroreceptor a
ctivity is pervasive in the experimental literature. Mie tested two hy
potheses: (a) that minute arterial pressure and cardiac autonomic outf
low changes during hypovolaemia induced by lower body suction in human
s are masked by alterations in breathing, and (b) that evidence for ar
terial baroreflex engagement might be obtained from measurements of th
oracic aorta dimensions. 2. In two studies, responses to graded lower
body suction at 0 (control), 5, 10, 15, 20 and 40 mmHg were examined i
n twelve and ten healthy young men, respectively. In the first, arteri
al pressure (photoplethysmograph), R-R interval, and respiratory sinus
arrhythmia amplitude (complex demodulation) were measured during unco
ntrolled and controlled breathing (constant breathing frequency and ti
dal volume). In the second, cross-sectional areas of the ascending tho
racic aorta were calculated from nuclear magnetic resonance images. 3.
Lower body suction with controlled breathing resulted in an increased
arterial pulse pressure at mild levels (5-20 mmHg; ANOVA, P < 0.05) a
nd a decreased arterial pulse pressure at moderate levels (40 mmHg; AN
OVA, P < 0.05). Both R-R intervals and respiratory sinus arrhythmia we
re negatively related to lower body suction level, whether group avera
ges (general linear regression, r > 0.92) or individual subjects (orth
ogonal polynomials, 12 of 12 subjects) were assessed. 4. Aortic pulse
area decreased progressively and significantly during mild lower body
suction, with 47 % of the total decline occurring by 5 mmHg. 5. These
results suggest that small reductions of effective blood volume reduce
aortic baroreceptive areas and trigger haemodynamic adjustments which
are so efficient that alterations in arterial pressure escape detecti
on by conventional means.