SYMPTOMATIC MUMPS-VIRUS REINFECTIONS

Citation
Jp. Gut et al., SYMPTOMATIC MUMPS-VIRUS REINFECTIONS, Journal of medical virology, 45(1), 1995, pp. 17-23
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Virology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01466615
Volume
45
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
17 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-6615(1995)45:1<17:SMR>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Although natural mumps virus infection is believed to induce lifelong immunity, our laboratory was confronted with 82 patients who developed mumps-evoking lesions but exhibited serological evidence of a booster immune response, namely a rise or a high titer of virus-specific IgG, without IgM. In order to provide arguments favoring the existence of recurrent mumps attacks, the age, symptomatology, and humoral response of these patients (group 1) were compared to that of 82 randomly sele cted true primary infected patients (group 2), 10 parainfluenza virus- infected patients (group 3), and 20 noninfected mumps-immune subjects (group 4). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) procedures with d ifferent viral antigenic preparations were used for determination of s pecific IgM, IgA, IgG, IgG subclasses, and IgG avidity. The patients o f group 1, older than those of group 2 (28 vs. 10 years, P < 0.0001), presented a significantly less severe and less typical symptomatology. Against the whole virus they exhibited IgG of higher avidity (P < 0.0 01), a lower prevalence and titer of IgA (10 vs. 68%, P < 0.0001 and 2 78 vs. 5,009, P < 0.001, respectively). Values obtained for IgG 1, 2, and 3 were significantly different between the two groups. Prevalence and absorbance of nucleocapsid-directed IgG 3 were significantly lower in group 1 (27 vs. 46%, P < 0.01 and 0.444 vs. 0.869, P < 0.01, respe ctively). A significant discrepancy also allowed patients from group 1 to be distinguished from those of groups 3 and 4. So the presumed mum ps-reinfected patients were different from primary infected ones and p resented features reminiscent of a secondary immune response, suggesti ng the not uncommon occurrence of symptomatic reinfections by the mump s virus. This concept is of importance in medical practice. (C) 1995 W iley-Liss, Inc.