BACKGROUND: The Indication for treatment with human gammaglobulin In p
atients with primary hypogammaglobulinemia is well established. Noneth
eless, there are no uniform criteria with regard to dosis, periodicity
and route of administration. METHODS: Twenty seven patients with comm
on variable Immunodeficiency (CVI) who received i.m. or i.v. treatment
with gammaglobulin were studied, evaluating the secondary effects, st
able levels of IgG achieved, control of symptomatology, clinical evolu
tion and the need for adjuvant therapies. RESULTS: Intravenous adminis
tration was more effective than intramuscular administration to achiev
e higher total IgG serum levels (5.2 +/- 1.2 vs 3.5 +/- 1.6 g/l; p = 0
.07) in a shorter period of time (2.1 +/- 1.6 months vs 6.3 +/- 2.8 mo
nths; p < 0.01) and with new few secondary effects. The dosis and peri
odicity of the treatment was Individualized in each patient on the bas
is of the needs of consumption and the speed of metabolism of the gamm
aglobulin, with patients with chronic bronchial supuration and diarrhe
a being those requiring the greatest doses (p < 0.0001) and a short in
terdosis time Interval (19.2 +/- 3.1 vs 23.6 +/- 3.6 days; p = 0.01).
Treatment with human gammaglobulin allowed the control of recurrent ba
cterial Infection; however, adjuvant treatment with respiratory physic
al measures and antibiotics were required in patients with chronic bro
nchial suppuration to avoid progressive alteration of respiratory func
tion. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of human gammaglobulin at adequa
te doses and frequency is effective to control infection, avoid the de
velopment of chronic bronchial disease, alteration of pulmonary functi
on and the appearance of other complications. Intravenous route Is saf
er and produces fewer secondary effects than Intramuscular administrat
ion with the doses and period of the treatment requiring Individualiza
tion for each patient