Two forms of ethical reflection are described. The first is expressed
via a theoretical normalization of a 'reflection process' - essential
elements of which are prior determination of the world and the people
who act therapeutically therein. Confrontation with the latter serves
to examine which consequences are achieved by abandoning such prior de
terminations. Normalization of the analytical process becomes a produc
t of the exchange between counterparts. Thus by definition it already
contains an emancipatory dimension of development. Both arguments are
illustrated by a practical example from Balint group work.