A. Evangelista et al., CARDIAC INDEX QUANTIFICATION BY DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN PATIENTS WITHOUT LEFT-VENTRICULAR OUTFLOW TRACT ABNORMALITIES, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(3), 1995, pp. 710-716
Objectives. We attempted to ascertain whether cardiac index can be dir
ectly estimated from Doppler mean velocity. Background. Although diver
se Doppler echocardiographic methods have been described for cardiac o
utput quantification, they are not widely used in clinical practice. C
ross-sectional area measurement has been identified as the main source
of error in flow volume quantification. Methods. A three-phase study
by Doppler echocardiography was conducted in 306 patients. In phase I,
the normal mean velocity ratio of the left and right ventricular outf
low tracts was established in 170 normal subjects. In phase II, cardia
c index, calculated as the product of aortic annular area index by mea
n velocity (conventional method), and mean velocity determined in the
left ventricular outflow tract and ascending aorta by pulsed and conti
nuous wave Doppler, respectively, were correlated with thermodilution
cardiac index in 66 patients. In phase III, the accuracy of the regres
sion equations obtained was prospectively assessed in an additional 70
patients. Results. The normal left/right ventricular outflow tract me
an velocity ratio by pulsed wave Doppler was 1.1 +/- 0.1. Cardiac inde
x (CI) calculated by the conventional method and thermodilution (TD) s
howed acceptable correlation (r = 0.90, CITD = 1.20 CIPWD + 357; r = 0
.86, CITD = 0.90 CICWD + 262) for pulsed (PWD) and continuous wave (CW
D) Doppler, respectively, but with systematic underestimation (- 28 +/
- 13%, p < 0.01) by pulsed wave Doppler. Mean velocity (MV showed exce
llent correlation with the thermodilution cardiac index (r = 0.97, CIT
D = 172 MV(PWD) - 172; r = 0.93, CITD = 129 MV(CWD) - 255). When these
regression equations were prospectively applied, better agreement wit
h the thermodilution cardiac index was obtained by pulsed wave Doppler
directly from mean velocity (SD 240 ml/min per m(2)) than when aortic
annular area was considered in the calculation (SD 428 ml/min per m(2
)). Similar results were obtained by continuous wave Doppler (SD 433 v
s. 599 ml/min per m(2)) but with less accuracy. Conclusions. Left vent
ricular outflow tract mean velocity determined by pulsed wave Doppler
permits easy, accurate cardiac index quantification in the absence of
left ventricular outflow abnormalities. The simplicity of this method
enhances its clinical applicability in noninvasive monitoring of cardi
ac index.