Spatially explicit models for animal populations (SEPMs) necessarily e
mbody assumptions about plant community structure and dynamics. This p
aper explores the advantages and limitations of directly linking anima
l SEPMs with models for vegetation dynamics. Such linkages may often b
e unnecessary. For instance, in research focussed on questions with sh
ort time horizons, the spatial patterning of vegetation can be reasona
bly approximated as a tired landscape templet for animal population dy
namics. But if one needs to consider longer time scales (e.g., decades
to centuries), landscapes will be dynamic. Models of vegetation dynam
ics provide useful tools for predicting landscape dynamics. We outline
the sorts of output from vegetation models that might be useful in an
imal SEPMs. We discuss as a concrete example recent forest simulators,
which predict with reasonable accuracy some variables (e.g., tree spe
cies composition), but which, to date, are quite poor for others (e.g.
, seed production). Moreover, because vegetation models target a restr
icted range of temporal and spatial scales, they may be more useful fo
r certain consumer groups than for others. Despite these cautionary ob
servations, we believe that the time is ripe for fruitful linkages bet
ween models of vegetation dynamics and animal SEPMs.