Mp. Daftarian et al., IMMUNE-RESPONSE TO SULFAMETHOXAZOLE IN PATIENTS WITH AIDS, Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2(2), 1995, pp. 199-204
Antibody- and cell-mediated responses to sulfamethoxazole (SMX) were a
nalyzed in AIDS patients with or without a history of hypersensitivity
and in negative controls. In 20 of 20 (P < 0.01) human immunodeficien
cy virus (HIV)-seropositive patients with skin reactions to cotrimoxaz
ole, we found SMX-specific antibodies, while only 9 of 20 and 17 of 20
HIV-seropositive patients without a history of hypersensitivity to co
trimoxazole had SMX-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG, respectiv
ely. The levels of specific IgM and IgG were higher in patients with s
kin reactions than in patients without reactions (IgM, 1.0 +/- 0.19 ve
rsus 0.47 +/- 0.23 [P < 0.001]; IgG, 0.68 +/- 0.15 versus 0.47 +/- 0.1
4 [P < 0.001] [mean optical density values +/- standard deviations]).
Seronegative controls with no history of exposure to sulfa compounds d
id not have SMX-specific IgG or IgM antibodies, and controls with a hi
story of intake of SMX with or without reactions had low levels of IgG
and IgM. The SMX-specific IgG subclasses were exclusively IgG1 and Ig
G3. None of the patients had detectable SMX-specific IgE or IgA antibo
dies nor did they exhibit a cell-mediated response as measured by a ly
mphocyte proliferation assay. Antibodies to SMX recognized N-acetyl-su
Ifonamide, N-(2-thiazolyl)-sulfanilamide, sulfadiazine, and sulfisoxaz
ole but did not recognize sulfanilamide or 3-amino-5-methyl isoxazole
in an inhibition assay. It is not known whether the SMX-specific antib
odies associated with hypersensitivity reactions to SMX in HIV-seropos
itive patients have a pathogenic role in these reactions. Sulfanilamid
e or 3-amino-5-methyl isoxazole, on the other hand, could be potential
alternative therapies in HIV-seropositive patients with a history of
skin reactions to SMX.