Most advanced industrial societies are confronting serious economic re
cession, and governments are seeking ways to stimulate economic growth
and reduce government expenditure. For many countries these problems
are compounded by aging populations and demographic changes. There are
fewer people in the workforce, and more people in older age groups li
ve longer and have increased expectations for retirement lifestyles. T
he result has been that many governments are radically transforming th
eir systems of retirement income provision, often causing political, e
conomic and social upheaval and widespread public anxiety. Australia i
s one country in which there have been huge changes in the retirement
income system in the past 5 years. The system has been substantially p
rivatized, and future retirement income will come from statutorily enf
orced earnings-related individual savings accumulated in decentralized
private funds. Australia's new retirement income regime bears extraor
dinary similarities to the Finnish system of employment-related pensio
ns, yet there was no reference to the Finnish system in the evolution
of the new Australian system. There are lessons for Australia and for
other countries in the long and successful operation of the Finnish pe
nsion system. This article first examines Australia's retirement incom
e system, recent government policy changes and likely implications of
these retirment policy changes for the future of Australia's tradition
al welfare state. Cross-national comparisons of the retirement income
regimes in Finland and Australia, identifying international best pract
ice in each country comprise the second half of the article. Such comp
arisons will be of interest to policy-makers seeking new policy direct
ions.