G. Walls, IS THERE A FIELD OF SOCIAL-WORK - TRAINEES EVALUATING SOCIAL-PROBLEMSAND SOCIAL-WORK, Scandinavian journal of social welfare, 4(1), 1995, pp. 28-35
My aim was to study the experiences and priorities of two age groups o
f social work students practicing in client-centered social work. This
article is based on the research on rationality and language games in
social work. The target groups of the research project as a whole wer
e the actors: the heads and social workers or activists in public soci
al welfare and health care agencies and institutions and in voluntary
associations and action groups, and finally, two subsequent classes of
students from a school of social work, during their practicing period
s. This article concentrates on the trainees. At first, the trainees w
rote essays and kept diaries. Secondly, they marked their standings on
graphs visualizing different types of information contents and social
relation structures. Thirdly, they made their choices of reasons for
and solutions to social problems on a problem wheel. The trainees' stu
dy, using different data gathering techniques, partly confirms the res
ults of the research of the other actor groups, in which the data were
derived using questionnaires and interviews. The trainees' study show
s variation in the respondents' priorities within and between specifie
d social problem categories. Qualitatively analyzed, however, the char
acterizations of social work, both those who currently act in and thos
e aiming to enter this field, resemble one another.