C. Kelche et al., THE EFFECTS OF INTRAHIPPOCAMPAL GRAFTS, TRAINING, AND POSTOPERATIVE HOUSING ON BEHAVIORAL RECOVERY AFTER SEPTOHIPPOCAMPAL DAMAGE IN THE RAT, Neurobiology of learning and memory, 63(2), 1995, pp. 155-166
This study examined whether the expression of behavioral effects of gr
afts rich in cholinergic neurons placed into the hippocampus of rats w
ith septohippocampal damage may be modulated by postoperative housing
or training conditions. Among 91 Long-Evans female rats, 61 sustained
a bilateral aspirative lesion of the fimbria-fornix fibers and all ove
rlying tissue, while 30 were given sham operations. Ten days after sur
gery, fetal septal suspension grafts were performed in the hippocampus
of half the lesioned rats. Two days later, all rats were randomly ass
igned to one of three housing or training conditions: standard, standa
rd with daily training, and enriched. Two and 5 months later, the rats
were tested for learning using a Hebb-Williams maze. At both these de
lays, performance was clearly impaired in lesioned rats and was found
to be ameliorated by grafts only in rats which had received daily trai
ning. Cresyl violet staining and acetylcholinesterase histochemistry s
howed that, irrespective of the housing or training conditions, all gr
afts had survived and provided the denervated hippocampus with a subst
antial cholinergic reinnervation. Our results suggest that the benefic
ial behavioral effects of intrahippocampal suspension grafts of septal
cells may depend on the postsurgical training or handling conditions
of the graft recipients. This result might be of importance for interp
reting some behavioral effects of grafts, since in most studies in whi
ch grafts were found to induce beneficial behavioral effects (especial
ly on learning capacity), these effects were generally observed at the
end of a rather long testing period. Moreover, the present findings s
how that this delay, before graft function is expressed, might be link
ed not only to the time needed by grafts to establish a functional rei
nnervation in the host brain, but also to the training and/or handling
conditions of the graft recipient. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.