GAS LEAKAGE AND THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A COMPARISON WITH THE TRACHEAL TUBE AND FACEMASK DURING SPONTANEOUS VENTILATION USING A CIRCLE BREATHING SYSTEM
Ae. Cameron et al., GAS LEAKAGE AND THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A COMPARISON WITH THE TRACHEAL TUBE AND FACEMASK DURING SPONTANEOUS VENTILATION USING A CIRCLE BREATHING SYSTEM, Anaesthesia, 51(12), 1996, pp. 1117-1119
The ability of the laryngeal mask airway, tracheal tube and facemask t
o provide a leak free seal in a clinical setting was assessed by measu
ring the minimal fresh gas flows needed in a closed circle system duri
ng spontaneous ventilation on 60 subjects. The fresh gasflow was reduc
ed until no spillage occurred from rite pop-off valve. This fresh gas
flow was taken to represent the sum of gas uptake by the subject and g
as leakage fi on? the circuit. The median fresh gas flow after 20 minu
tes was 350 ml.min(-1) in the laryngeal mask airway group, 350 ml.min(
-1) in the tracheal tube group and 450 ml.min(-1) in the facemask grou
p. The fresh gas flow required for facemask group was significantly hi
gher than that for the laryngeal mask airway ol tracheal tribe groups
(p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the flesh gas
flows required for the tracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway groups.
We conclude that the laryngeal mask airway provides as good a gas tig
ht seal as a tracheal tribe in this context and would be of benefit in
I educing anaesthetic gas pollution.