DOSE EMISSIONS FROM MARKETED DRY POWDER INHALERS

Authors
Citation
M. Hindle et Pr. Byron, DOSE EMISSIONS FROM MARKETED DRY POWDER INHALERS, International journal of pharmaceutics, 116(2), 1995, pp. 169-177
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
03785173
Volume
116
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
169 - 177
Database
ISI
SICI code
0378-5173(1995)116:2<169:DEFMDP>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The dose emission characteristics of eight marketed dry powder inhaler s (DPIs: Intal Spinhaler(R), Ventolin and Becotide Diskhalers(R), Vent olin and Becotide Rotahalers(R), Bricanyl and Pulmicort Turbohalers(R) , Berotec Inhalator(R)) have been investigated using the proposed USP dosage unit sampling apparatus for DPIs. Intra- and inter-device varia tion in emitted doses was determined at air flow rates of 60 and 100 l /min using a 4 lair throughput in each case except Inhalator(R), which was tested at 30 l/min only. The sampling apparatus was found to be s uitable for quantifying single emitted doses from all of these devices which comprise examples of low, medium and high airflow resistance DP Is (Table 1 footnote). Dose emissions from the DPIs are presented as p ercentages of the manufacturers' label claims. Under all test flow con ditions variability was high, when compared to the uniformity of conte nt standards usually applied to pharmaceutical products; in some cases relative standard deviations (RSD) were greater than 15%, both within and between devices. However, under the proposed USP test flow rate c onditions, the total RSD (n = 25) was < 15% around the average emitted dose in all cases except Pulmicort Turbohaler(R); such variance (RSD < 15%) is proposed to be acceptable for DPIs delivering current medica tions. Only the Intal Spinhaler(R) emitted an average dose similar to its label claim. Testing at 100 l/min vs 60 l/min significantly increa sed DPI drug emission and reduced the device retention of both the Ven tolin(R) and Becotide(R) versions of the low resistance devices, Rotah aler(R) and Diskhaler(R). Using these same flow rates for testing the dose emissions from the medium resistance Bricanyl and Pulmicort Turbo halers(R), there was no significant difference in drug output between the two flow rates.