Accommodation, or the change in refractive power of the eye to focus o
bjects at different distances, is driven by many stimuli including def
ocus blur, the awareness of target distance or proximal cues, and thro
ugh the vergence crosslink (convergence accommodation), The effectiven
ess of defocus blur as an accommodative stimulus is decreased in norma
lly-sighted subjects as visual acuity is experimentally reduced and as
the target is imaged at increasing eccentricities from the fovea, Sin
ce subjects with central retinal abnormalities have reduced visual acu
ity and typically fixate eccentrically, one would predict that defocus
blur would not be an effective accommodative stimulus for them, Using
an infrared optometer, steady-state accommodative responses of six su
bjects with juvenile macular degeneration (JMD) and of three normally-
sighted controls were measured, The effectiveness of defocus blur in s
timulating accommodation varied across the subjects and was related to
visual acuity, with those subjects having worse acuity showing less a
ccurate accommodative responses, When provided with additional cues to
accommodative demand (i.e. proximal and/or binocular cues), subjects
with JMD showed more accurate accommodative responses, In general, tho
se subjects who did not modulate accommodative response with changing
defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accommodation under binocul
ar viewing, In contrast, those subjects who did change accommodative r
esponse with changing defocus blur cues showed the most accurate accom
modation under monocular viewing.