PROTONATION OF GLU L212 FOLLOWING Q(B)(-) FORMATION IN THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC REACTION-CENTER OF RHODOBACTER-SPHAEROIDES - EVIDENCE FROM TIME-RESOLVED INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY
R. Hienerwadel et al., PROTONATION OF GLU L212 FOLLOWING Q(B)(-) FORMATION IN THE PHOTOSYNTHETIC REACTION-CENTER OF RHODOBACTER-SPHAEROIDES - EVIDENCE FROM TIME-RESOLVED INFRARED-SPECTROSCOPY, Biochemistry, 34(9), 1995, pp. 2832-2843
The protonation events that occur upon Q(A)-Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) elect
ron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphae
roides were investigated by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy using
tunable diode lasers as previously described [Mantele, W., Hienerwadel
, R., Lent, F., Riedel, E., J., Grisar, R., & Tacke, M. (1990) Spectro
sc. Int. 2, 29-35; Hienerwadel, R., Thibodeau, D. L., Lent, F., Nabedr
yk, E., Breton, J., Kreutz, W., & Mantele, W., (1992) Biochemistry 31,
5799-5808]. In the midinfrared region between 1695 and 1780 cm(-1), t
ransient signals associated with Q(A)-Q(B) --> Q(A)Q(B)(-) electron tr
ansfer were observed and characterized. The dominant transient absorba
nce changes are three positive signals at 1732, 1725, and 1706 cm(-1)
and two negative signals at 1716 and at 1698 cm(-1). The 1725 cm(-1)-s
ignal disappears upon H-1 --> H-2 exchange as expected for an accessib
le COOH group and is absent in Glu L212 Gln mutant reaction centers, O
n this basis, we propose an assignment of this signal to the COOH grou
p of Glu L212. The other signals could correspond to intensity changes
and/or shifts of other carboxylic residues, although contributions fr
om ester C=O groups of bacteriopheophytins cannot be ruled out. In nat
ive reaction centers at pH 7 and at 4 degrees C, biphasic kinetics of
the transient components were observed at most frequencies. The major
signal at 1725 cm-l exhibits a fast kinetic component of t(1/2) = 0.18
ms (25% of the total amplitude) and a slow one of t(1/2) = 1 ms (75%
of the total amplitude). A global fit analysis of the signals between
1695 and 1780 cm(-1) revealed that the spectral distributions of the f
ast and the slow components are different, Biphasic kinetics with comp
arable half-times were also observed for the Glu L212 to Gin mutant, T
he simplest model to explain these results is that the fast phase repr
esents electron transfer and the slow phase represents proton transfer
and/or conformational changes coupled to electron transfer. The diffe
rence spectra of the slow component from native reaction centers show
that the 1725 cm(-1) band corresponds to an absorbance increase and no
t to a shift of an existing band, The signal is therefore proposed to
arise from the protonation of Glu L212. The amplitude of the 1725 cm(-
1) signal varies distinctly with pH as expected fdr protonation of a C
OO- group. With increasing pH, the amplitude of the slow component inc
reases while that of the fast component decreases slightly. Both compo
nents slow down with increasing pH reaching half-times of 0.3 and 2.5
ms, respectively, at pH 10. These results can be explained if one assu
mes that Glu L212 is partly protonated upon single-electron reduction
of Q(B). On the basis of integrated extinction coefficients of COOH re
sidues, a proton uptake of 0.3-0.6 H+ at pH 7 per reaction center by G
lu L212 is proposed. This proton uptake shows little variation from pH
5 to pH 9 but increases above pH 9. This behavior cannot be explained
by the titration of a single isolated titrating residue. However, it
can be interpreted by the interaction of Glu L212 with other charged g
roups in the Q(B) site.